
The road to Hell is paved with good intentions, it is said. Wise words. Such is the case with Dolphin Safe Tuna, according to analysis at Southern Fried Science.
When it was determined many years ago that too many dolphins were dying at the hands of fisherman trying to snare tuna, an ecological push towards “dolphin safe tuna’ became the norm. You now find the logo for dolphin safe tuna on just about every can.
But there is a dark side:
If you work out the math on this (and you don’t have to, because the environmental justice foundation did) , you find that 1 dolphin saved costs 382 mahi-mahi, 188 wahoo, 82 yellowtail and other large fish, 27 sharks, and almost 1,200 small fish.
By trying to help dolphins, groups like Greenpeace caused one of the worst marine ecological disasters of all time. Few other fisheries are as bad for groups like sharks and sea turtles as the purse seine fishery, and none are as large in scale.
Here we get into the ethical debate.
Is it worth saving dolphins, who were not and are not endangered, at the expense of sea turtles, sharks, and many other fish species who are endangered?
To make this debate more interesting, I am taking the options of “just stop fishing for tuna” and “come up with another way” off the table- it’s simply not going to happen in reality, anyway.


