<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>InfoAddict &#187; board games</title> <atom:link href="http://www.infoaddict.com/tag/board-games/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.infoaddict.com</link> <description>The web's best supplier for information junkies.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 13:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>The Board Game Risk is Now Going to be a Movie. Sigh.</title><link>http://www.infoaddict.com/the-board-game-risk-is-now-going-to-be-a-movie-sigh</link> <comments>http://www.infoaddict.com/the-board-game-risk-is-now-going-to-be-a-movie-sigh#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:41:19 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>CJensen@infoaddict.com</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Games]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Battleship]]></category> <category><![CDATA[board games]]></category> <category><![CDATA[boardgames]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Candyland]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Monopoly]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.infoaddict.com/?p=3770</guid> <description><![CDATA[
It&#8217;s bad enough Hollywood is embarking upon such cinematic crap-fests as a Battleship, Monopoly and Candyland, but now we can add the classic strategy game Risk to the list of bankrupt ideas.
We&#8217;ve got Sony to blame for this latest fiasco.
From Variety:
Property, which pits players against one another in a quest to annex all of the [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: center;"><img
class=" aligncenter" src="http://www.infoaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/HLIC/28ab710cf143c731f2ad3a504a757df3.jpg" alt="http://www.infoaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/HLIC/28ab710cf143c731f2ad3a504a757df3.jpg" width="484" height="402" /></p><p>It&#8217;s bad enough Hollywood is embarking upon such cinematic crap-fests as a Battleship, Monopoly and Candyland, but now we can add the classic strategy game Risk to the list of bankrupt ideas.</p><p>We&#8217;ve got Sony to blame for this latest fiasco.</p><p><a
href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118010867.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;query=Risk" target="_blank">From Variety:</a></p><blockquote><p>Property, which pits players against one another in a quest to annex all of the world&#8217;s territories, has become desirable thanks to the box office success of the Paramount adaptations of Hasbro&#8217;s Transformers and G.I. Joe.</p><p>&#8220;The strategic thinking and the tactical gambles that players must take in the game are what make Risk a classic, thoroughly engaging game,&#8221; said Columbia prexy Doug Belgrad. Those elements translated into an action-packed, thrilling story are what will make this a uniquely exciting movie.&#8221;</p></blockquote><p>Yes, these execs actually believe their own bullshit. Can we just get around to announcing Pin-The-Tail-On-The-Donkey and Tic-Tac-Tough?</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.infoaddict.com/the-board-game-risk-is-now-going-to-be-a-movie-sigh/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/21 queries in 0.180 seconds using disk

Served from: box293.bluehost.com @ 2010-09-09 20:20:11 -->